Innovative research points out the flaws of proposed alternatives to issuer-paid credit ratings.
Imagine paying someone to rate you and then expecting their evaluation to be entirely objective. As inane as it sounds, that’s the current setup between issuers and the credit rating agencies that assign those all-important letter grades to structured securities. There ought to be a better way, but – as economist Dion Bongaerts points out in his erudite analysis – alternatives may not be as cost-effective or competitive as the existing issuer-paid system. getAbstract recommends this seminal report to investors, issuers and analysts involved in assessing securities risk.
In this summary, you will learn
- What inherent flaws exist in traditional issuer-paid credit rating agency (CRA) arrangements
- What pros and cons proposed alternatives present
- What steps regulators should take toward improving the current credit rating system
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
Leonard E. Burman et al.
Brookings Institution, 2015
New York Fed, 2014
World Economic Forum
World Economic Forum, 2016
Larry D. Wall
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 2016