More and more US multinationals are undertaking corporate inversions – transactions in which a large firm becomes a “nominal subsidiary” of a smaller foreign company in a tax-friendly jurisdiction. Generally, companies structure such deals so that they can shelter income in a low-tax country. American corporations claim that these transactions are necessary if they are to remain globally competitive in a high US tax environment, but such assertions are “almost entirely fact free,” according to professor Edward D. Kleinbard. His rigorous examination of often-tedious tax rules contrasts with his fiery debunking of corporate complaints. getAbstract recommends Kleinbard’s intriguing, lively take on a timely topic – particularly as the White House moves to curtail inversions – to CEOs, legislators, and others with an interest in reforming the US corporate tax code and keeping American tax dollars in the United States.
In this summary, you will learn
- Why US multinationals carry out corporate inversions,
- Why corporate claims that high US taxes drive them to inversions reportedly ring false, and
- How legislators can impede corporate inversions and bring tax revenue back to the United States.
About the Author
Edward D. Kleinbard is a professor of law and business at the USC Gould School of Law.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
Florence Jaumotte et al.
Niam Yaraghi and Shamika Ravi
Brookings Institution, 2016
World Economic Forum, 2016
World Bank Group
World Bank, 2016