European banks are diverse and engage in different forms of risk-taking, so assessing their fundamental stability is no easy task. Researcher Willem Pieter De Groen finds that the current European Banking Authority stress test offers greater insights into existing problems, such as nonperforming loans and corporate and government debt exposures, than into banks’ underlying soundness and risk resilience. getAbstract recommends this scholarly analysis – written more for the banker, economist and regulator than the layperson – for its cogent arguments in favor of a more robust methodology for bank stress testing.
In this summary, you will learn
- What the European Banking Authority’s stress test reveals about European banks,
- Why this test fails to gauge banks’ overall stability and
- What changes in the testing methodology would provide a clearer picture of European banking’s underlying condition.
About the Author
Willem Pieter De Groen is a research fellow at the Center for European Policy Studies.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
ReportDid the Founding of the Federal Reserve Affect the Vulnerability of the Interbank System to Systemic Risk?
Mark Carlson and David C. Wheelock
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 2016
Jihad Dagher et al.
Finance & Development Magazine, 2016
Gerold Grasshoff et al.
Boston Consulting Group, 2017