Summary of The Role of Institutional Investors in Curbing Corporate Short-Termism

Looking for the report?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

The Role of Institutional Investors in Curbing Corporate Short-Termism summary


9 Overall

9 Importance

9 Innovation

10 Style


“Corporate short-termism” – the penchant of markets, investors and the media to score corporations strictly by their quarterly earnings reports – keeps publicly traded companies from creating sustainable long-term value. Minority-owner hedge funds loudly press for stock price boosts, while majority-owner institutional investors remain largely silent, failing to exercise their ample ownership clout. Finance executive Robert C. Pozen offers ideas on how to battle corporate short-termism in this instructive article on a topic that receives much less coverage than it deserves. getAbstact recommends it to anyone concerned about the impacts of short-term corporate decision making.

In this summary, you will learn

  • What role activist hedge funds play in promoting “corporate short-termism,”
  • Why institutional investors rarely oppose them or advocate for longer-term approaches, and
  • What regulators and others can do to encourage a more active role for institutional investors in proxy voting.

About the Author

Robert C. Pozen, a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, is a former chairman of MFS Investment Management and a former vice-chairman of Fidelity Investments.



Publicly traded companies are saddled with “corporate short-termism,” the tendency of markets, investors and the media to focus on quarterly earning reports. A survey of CFOs found that the majority would waive investing in future projects to meet that quarter’s estimates. Activist hedge funds, typically...

Comment on this summary

More on this topic

By the same author

Customers who read this summary also read

More by category