Summary of Debunking 5 Myths About Frexit

Bruegel,

Get the Article

Debunking 5 Myths About Frexit summary
A French exit from the euro would bring a host of problems far greater than its benefits.

Rating

8 Overall

8 Importance

8 Innovation

7 Style

Recommendation

The harmful consequences of a French exit from the euro zone would likely overwhelm any purported benefits, according to economist Grégory Claeys, who claims “no exit” would be a more viable choice for France than Frexit. Claeys says that all stakeholders would stand to lose with Frexit, given the integration of France’s economy in the global financial system. While always politically neutral, getAbstract recommends Claeys’s note, written for the policy maker, economist or general reader with an advanced grounding in political economy, for its succinct yet well-articulated arguments.

In this summary, you will learn

  • What five arguments counter beliefs about the results of a potential French exit from the euro zone;
  • How Frexit could damage France and the global economy.
 

Summary

The 2017 French presidential elections have fired up the debate on France’s place in the euro zone. Naysayers argue that a Frexit would be hassle-free and uncomplicated, support greater competitiveness among French companies, and permit unconstrained and independent monetary and fiscal policy. “Five...
Get the key points from this article in less than 10 minutes. Learn more about our products or log in

About the Author

Grégory Claeys is a research fellow at Bruegel, a European think tank.


Comment on this summary

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

More by category