Summary of Gutenberg’s moving type propelled Europe towards the scientific revolution

Looking for the article?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Gutenberg’s moving type propelled Europe towards the scientific revolution summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

7

Qualities

  • Eye Opening
  • Overview
  • Background

Recommendation

The smartphone, internet and social media are reshaping economies and society in the 21st century on a par with Johannes Gutenberg’s revolutionary invention of the printing press six centuries ago. That machine brought automation, competition and mass production to the world of information, with enormous consequences for people’s daily lives. In this fascinating and insightful historical analysis, economist Jeremiah Dittmar and data scientist Skipper Seabold report on the profound changes wrought by the printing press and cast them as precedents for the scope of the digital transformation taking place in the 2000s.

About the Authors

Jeremiah Dittmar is an assistant professor at the London School of Economics. Skipper Seabold is the director of data science at Civis Analytics in Chicago. 

 

Summary

One of European history’s most momentous technologies sprouted from the mind of Johannes Gutenberg in the 15th century: the printing press, based on the mechanism of moving type. Before then, individuals labored to transmit ideas, express thoughts and exchange information via handwritten text. Gutenberg’s creation transformed a broad swath of human activity. High-volume printing drove large-scale disruptions throughout the economic, political and social infrastructure.

The automation of setting words to paper substantially reduced the costs of manufacturing books...


More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

Should Economists Be More Concerned About Artificial Intelligence?
8
Why Does Everyone Hate MMT?
8
Utopia for Realists
8
The Great Leveler
8
The Global Risks Report 2019
8
Straight Talk on Trade
8

Related Channels

Comment on this summary