Instant access to over 22,000 book summaries
Discover your next favorite book with getAbstract.
See prices >>
Stay up-to-date with emerging trends in less time.
Learn more >>
- Eye Opening
While the rating tells you how good a book is according to our two core criteria, it says nothing about its particular defining features. Therefore, we use a set of 20 qualities to characterize each book by its strengths:
Applicable – You’ll get advice that can be directly applied in the workplace or in everyday situations.
Analytical – You’ll understand the inner workings of the subject matter.
Background – You’ll get contextual knowledge as a frame for informed action or analysis.
Bold – You’ll find arguments that may break with predominant views.
Comprehensive – You’ll find every aspect of the subject matter covered.
Concrete Examples – You’ll get practical advice illustrated with examples of real-world applications or anecdotes.
Controversial – You’ll be confronted with strongly debated opinions.
Eloquent – You’ll enjoy a masterfully written or presented text.
Engaging – You’ll read or watch this all the way through the end.
Eye opening – You’ll be offered highly surprising insights.
For beginners – You’ll find this to be a good primer if you’re a learner with little or no prior experience/knowledge.
For experts – You’ll get the higher-level knowledge/instructions you need as an expert.
Hot Topic – You’ll find yourself in the middle of a highly debated issue.
Innovative – You can expect some truly fresh ideas and insights on brand-new products or trends.
Insider’s take – You’ll have the privilege of learning from someone who knows her or his topic inside-out.
Inspiring – You’ll want to put into practice what you’ve read immediately.
Overview – You’ll get a broad treatment of the subject matter, mentioning all its major aspects.
Scientific – You’ll get facts and figures grounded in scientific research.
Visionary – You’ll get a glimpse of the future and what it might mean for you.
Well structured – You’ll find this to be particularly well organized to support its reception or application.
The COVID-19 recession has upended global trade, and its impacts across and within economic sectors are asymmetric. Some industries are faring better than others: US imports of pharmaceuticals have increased, while exports of services such as hospitality and tourism have been decimated. The Brookings Institution’s David Dollar and Anna Newby discuss the trade data’s implications for the US economy in this illuminating episode of the Dollars and Sense podcast.
- The coronavirus pandemic is affecting American imports and exports in different ways.
- The COVID-19 recession tells an interesting story about trade relations.
- Examining the complexities of value chains helps to sort out the debate on reshoring.
The coronavirus pandemic is affecting American imports and exports in different ways.
The pandemic’s recessionary impacts have been greater on US imports than on exports. In the first half of 2020, compared to the same period in 2019, US crude oil imports declined some 40%, as COVID-19 lockdowns curtailed people’s driving. Car imports also experienced a steep drop. And US television and cell phone imports decreased by 25%, likely due to consumers’ income uncertainty. Pharmaceutical imports, though, jumped about 15%.
““This kind of crisis is always going to create some opportunities for particular industries, and it’s going to create really serious problems for some of the sectors.” ”
US exports are down by 16% overall in the first six months of 2020. Hardest hit are America’s exports of services, which fell by 50%. Among these services are those provided to foreign tourists and students, who would typically spend on lodging, meals, entertainment and education. However, US exports of financial services and telecommunications have remained constant. Disparities also show up in different manufacturing areas: Exports of aircraft and car parts dropped between 30% and 40%, while those of semiconductors rose by 12%.
The COVID-19 recession tells an interesting story about trade relations.
The US–China trade conflict carries on in the midst of the worldwide coronavirus recession. In the first half of 2020, America’s imports from China fell by about 20%. But US imports from Mexico and Canada also declined by 20%. These data indicate that the recession is the bigger story in the trade disruption than the US–China disputes are. Furthermore, US goods going to Canada and Mexico were off by 20%, compared to only 5% for China. During the first half of 2020, all of North America was experiencing a deep recession, while China had already begun its recovery.
““The recession is a lot more important than the trade war.” ”
The global slowdown puts the Trump administration in an odd position with its 2017 phase-one trade deal. Does the United States scrap the agreement because of China’s failure to meet the terms, or is the larger picture more important? The pandemic makes some conditions difficult, if not impossible, to meet. COVID-19 containment policies put a moratorium on travel; thus, stipulated increases in US exports of hospitality cannot take place. And the low demand for crude oil restricts those US exports to China. Financial markets would likely not react well to the administration’s abandonment of the trade deal.
Examining the complexities of value chains helps to sort out the debate on reshoring.
China manufactures many items exported to America, but few are from American companies. Instead, most US firms operating in China are serving local markets. It would not make sense for those businesses to reshore goods to the United States and then export them to China. Items produced in China for export to the United States come largely from Korean, Japanese and Taiwanese firms. Bringing the production of merchandise like electronics, photographic equipment and televisions back to the United States would be too expensive, especially when other Asian nations like Vietnam are part of the finished goods’ supply chains.
““We don’t want to try to get everything to be produced in the United States because that’s going to end up being very, very costly. But we could have a careful look at which kinds of value chains we’d like to see in the United States.” ”
Returning manufacturing to the United States would be prudent for certain goods. Examples are items related directly to American national security, like some pharmaceuticals and advanced technologies. But even these products would be more costly to make in the United States.
About the Authors
The Dollars and Sense podcast series, hosted by Brookings Institution senior fellow David Dollar, looks at global trade issues. Anna Newby is communications director and managing editor of foreign policy at Brookings.
This document is restricted to personal use only.