American politicians across the political spectrum agree at least on one thing: the need to restore “full employment.” Economic historian James Livingston posits that this is both unrealistic and uncalled-for. Writing for the online magazine Aeon, he argues that the obsession with work prevents Americans from facing the realities of the 21st-century labor market and from finding a new purpose in life that doesn’t revolve around their jobs. getAbstract recommends this stirring critique of American work culture as an upper for the unemployed and food for thought for workaholics. And by the way, Livingston’s writing style is more refined than his essay’s title might suggest.
In this summary, you will learn
- Why no federal policies will restore “full employment” in the United States,
- Why Americans’ obsession with their work ethic don’t match the realities of the 21st-century labor market,
- How the federal government can generate the necessary revenue to provide a basic income for every American.
About the Author
James Livingston is history professor at Rutgers University in New Jersey. His latest book is No More Work: Why Full Employment is a Bad Idea.
Get the key points from this article in 10 minutes.
For your company
We help you build a culture of continuous learning.
Comment on this summary
By the same author
Basic Books, 2011
Customers who read this summary also read
Darrell M. West
Brookings Institution, 2015
The Atlantic, 2016
World Employment Confederation–Europe
WEC Europe, 2016