Summary of Naturals and Strivers

Looking for the report?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Naturals and Strivers summary

Rating

8 Overall

9 Importance

9 Innovation

7 Style

Recommendation

Are so-called prodigies – Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Pablo Picasso, Bobby Fischer and Shirley Temple – more talented than those who “strive” for expertise? Most experts claim not. However, research from social psychologists Chia-Jung Tsay and Mahzarin R. Banaji reveals that authorities may, inadvertently, favor innate talent when evaluating performance. getAbstract believes this eye-opening examination will help those working in human resources and university admissions departments make better – and less biased – decisions for their organizations.

In this summary, you will learn

  • What constitutes “naturalness bias,”
  • What experiments revealed about the naturalness bias and
  • What implications the naturalness bias has for hiring and admissions experts.
 

About the Authors

Chia-Jung Tsay is an assistant professor in the University College London’s School of Management. Mahzarin R. Banaji is a social psychologist at Harvard University.

 

Summary

In all walks of life – education, athletics, music, art, science and business – people evaluate the “talent” of others. The judgments of experts, in particular, can have a great influence on your future; they serve as “gatekeepers,” deciding whom to choose, reward, coach and promote. In the United States...

Comment on this summary

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

More by category