Summary of Retiring Retirement

Looking for the article?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Retiring Retirement summary

Editorial Rating



  • Innovative


The US government set the age of eligibility for the national pension program at 65 in 1935, when health and life expectancies were drastically different from today. Writer Linda Marsa, herself over age 65, reveals why retirement is a persistent but outdated concept. Data show that many older adults are willing and able to continue working and that the economy will need them to do so. Progressive companies are starting to adapt the workplace to accommodate them and profiting from it. getAbstract recommends this article to mature workers and those in a position to hire them.

About the Author

Linda Marsa is a contributing editor at Discover magazine and author of Fevered: How a Hotter Planet Will Harm Our Health.


The US government introduced a pension for retirees in 1935. Economics required the program to have an eligibility age, even though health was clearly a more important factor in people’s ability to work. By setting the age at 65, the government stereotyped over-65s as less healthy and less independent than their younger counterparts. Rising life expectancies and the trend towards less physically demanding work hasn’t changed this perception.

In a recent US study, more than half of participants over age 85 felt healthy enough to continue working. Today’s over-65s have...

Comment on this summary

More on this topic

By the same author

The Neurofix
How Does Gender Equity Affect Women in Retirement?
Older and Wiser?
The World in 2030
Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer in a Time of Climate Change
Women at the Core of the Fight Against COVID-19 Crisis
The 2019 Future of Work Index

Related Channels