While dozens of marine geoengineering projects have been proposed to tackle global warming, none has been deployed on the massive scale necessary to make a difference. The risk of catastrophic results is amplified by a lack of solid scientific data. Moving forward, researchers must build a solid, shared database, catalog drawbacks and benefits, develop a specific methodology, and work under vigilant policymaker oversight. This Nature article will remind readers that, while climate change is a critical issue, people must not make the situation worse by harming the oceans.
About the Authors
Philip Boyd is professor of marine biogeochemistry at the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania. Chris Vivian is a former national marine adviser at the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, UK.
Comment on this summary
In our Journal
3 years ago
Too Much Water, and Not Enough
It’s a paradox of climate change that rising global temperatures mean rising seas but also retreating freshwater resources. What technologies can help? In Greek myth, the gods punished Tantalus by making him spend eternity in water up to his neck. Yet every time he tried to take a drink, the water receded. It was exquisite torture: […]