Summary of States and sovereignty in the Middle East: myths and realities

Looking for the article?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

States and sovereignty in the Middle East: myths and realities summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans




  • Analytical
  • Background
  • For Experts


From the Arab Spring to the Syrian Civil War and the rise of ISIS, the Middle East has undergone tremendous upheaval in recent years, leading many experts to predict the imminent disintegration of the Middle East state system. However, as Oxford University political scientist Louise Fawcett argues in International Affairs, these predictions have so far failed to materialize. Fawcett challenges some of the international relations theories that have given rise to the myth that the Middle East’s artificially drawn borders are too weak to withstand the kind of internal and external challenges they have been fighting since 2011. getAbstract recommends her heavily footnoted paper to political scientists and anyone who wants to find out why the borders in the Middle East are not actually crumbling.

About the Author

Louise Fawcett is professor of international relations at St. Catherine’s College at Oxford University.



The Arab uprisings, which started in late 2010, along with the onset of the Syrian Civil War and the rise of ISIS, prompted predictions of imminent state breakdown and radical changes to the Middle Eastern border system. In response, scholars and media experts frequently invoked the World War I–era Sykes-Picot agreement between the English and the French, which divided the territories of the former Ottoman Empire between the two colonial powers and arbitrarily lumped together people from different ethnic and religious backgrounds.   

The Middle...

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

Fragile Nation, Shattered Land
The Unwanted Wars
America’s War for the Greater Middle East
How Syria Came to This
The Middle East’s New Battle Lines
The Evolving Terrorist Threat: Implications for Global Security

Related Channels

Comment on this summary