More and more, Americans feel like strangers to one another over what sociologist Arlie Russell Hochschild calls “an increasingly hostile split” in attitudes. A professor emerita of sociology at the University of California at Berkeley, Hochschild traveled to Louisiana repeatedly over a five-year span starting in 2011 for field research on the American Right. She attempts to analyze and understand the emotional motivations of her new “Tea Party friends.” Conservatives might feel Hochschild failed to take their perspectives on board; liberals might see a paradox in her effort to develop empathy for people who can appear to lack empathy for themselves. getAbstract recommends Hoschchild’s fascinating research and conclusions to US voters of any ideology and to all non-Americans who seek greater insight into the sometimes contradictory, sometimes inexplicable behavior of the US electorate.
In this summary, you will learn
- How a “great paradox” shapes conservative politics and drives some Louisiana voters’ choices,
- What economic and environmental challenges the state faces, and
- Why conservative voters oppose some government programs that help them.
About the Author
Influential sociologist Arlie Russell Hochschild’s nine books include The Second Shift, The Time Bind, The Managed Heart and The Outsourced Self. Three of her books were New York Times Notable Books of the Year.
Customers who read this summary also read
Comment on this summary
6 months agoThe points she claims in the text are all of beneficial contests to the tea party as she goea back and forth from party to party, realized her swings at the crowd make a blurres scenery.
10 months agoa good analysis. Writer has even helped understand my own society in Pakistan.
12 months agoCompletely agree with the previous reviewer. The author clearly approaches her subjects with her Ivory Tower bias.
12 months agoI get the clear impression that the author makes little effort to understand her subjects from their own paradigm or understand their positive values. The overwhelming message conveyed in this summary is how stupid and emotional conservatives are. Not a great step for bridging any divides.