Summary of The Idolatry of Interest Rates Part I

Looking for the report?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

The Idolatry of Interest Rates Part I summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans




  • Innovative
  • Eye Opening
  • Engaging


Some economic assumptions are so deep-rooted that market experts, policy makers and economists forget to question their origins. One of these is the equilibrium real interest rate, the mythical rate at which the economy is in balance and to which central bankers adapt their policies in order to drive the economy faster or slower. Investment expert James Montier offers his iconoclastic but thought-provoking take on the notion, which getAbstract believes will intrigue – or infuriate – financial and economic professionals.

About the Author

James Montier is on the asset allocation team of the investment management firm GMO.



Central bankers and economists obsess over the concept of an equilibrium real interest rate, which former Fed chairman Ben Bernanke defined as “the real interest rate consistent with full employment of labor and capital resources.” While this hypothetical rate shifts over time – higher when the economy is thriving, lower when it’s not – policy makers use it to guide their monetary policy. In current theory, a central bank’s management of interest rates should trend toward the real equilibrium interest rate. Alas, little evidence of such a rate exists, and it’s unlikely the notion helps monetary policy. Rather, it is a sign of groupthink...

More on this topic

By the same author

Why Does Everyone Hate MMT?
Market Macro Myths
The Idolatry of Interest Rates Part II / The Idolatry Companion
The World’s Dumbest Idea
A CAPE Crusader

Customers who read this summary also read

Rethinking Economics
The Financial Crisis and the Free Market Cure
Between Debt and the Devil
The American Economy
Latin America: An End to Boom and Bust?
Banks are paying people to borrow money. That’s alarming news for the global economy.

Related Channels

Comment on this summary