Summary of The Implications of a No-Deal Brexit

Looking for the report?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

The Implications of a No-Deal Brexit summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans




  • Analytical
  • Overview
  • Hot Topic


A no-deal Brexit is no good. While a delay of the departure merely postpones the inevitable, it could afford both the United Kingdom and the European Union a bit more space to consider the weight of any decisions taken. This worthy research note from Guntram B. Wolff, Bruegel's director, advises the EU to make a no-deal exit as costly to the UK as possible while remaining flexible as to departure terms. But, he warns, failure should not be an option; there is much to do, as so much is at stake.

About the Author

Guntram B. Wolff is the director of Bruegel, a Brussels-based think tank.



European Union officials are preparing for the economic maelstrom that will roil the post-Brexit environment. The United Kingdom leaving with no agreement in place could be ruinous, particularly in the short term. Over the longer term, a “no-deal Brexit” could damage political relationships and compromise trade agreements. Brexit could play out in several different ways, the least harmful of which would be via a “negotiated withdrawal” from the EU. A no-deal departure lies at the other end of the spectrum. In between would be the UK’s request ...

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

An Assessment of the Economic Impact of Brexit on the EU27
The Uneven Path Ahead
Just a Little Brexit?
Which Groups Will Suffer Most as a Consequence of Brexit?
Did Austerity Cause Brexit?
Europe in a New World Order

Related Channels

Comment on this summary