Summary of The Master Switch

Looking for the book?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 10 minutes.

The Master Switch book summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans




  • Innovative
  • Evergreen
  • Bestseller


Innovation has been a serial killer in the information industry since the advent of the telephone doomed the telegraph. Great advances in communications technology herald the start of new industries, but the corporate history of such breakthroughs shows a cycle of fragmentation followed by concentration, followed by another breakthrough and another splintered set of small companies chasing that innovation’s promise. The Internet may defy this cycle. Whether control of the web will consolidate or remain diffuse remains to be seen. However, historic patterns suggest that today’s major Internet companies may become part of larger media empires, thus centralizing control of online content. Columbia University professor Tim Wu offers a rich saga tracing the evolution of telecommunications industries, technology and regulations, and explains what these patterns portend. He says policy makers must limit corporate control of the web because open online information now is essential to society. getAbstract recommends Wu’s book to readers interested in the future of the information industry and its centerpiece, the Internet.

In this summary, you will learn

  • Why telecommunications industries – telephony, radio, film, TV, cable and Internet – built on revolutionary new technology gradually consolidate;
  • How the US government shapes the structure of these industries; and
  • Why history suggests commercial forces eventually could centralize control of online content.

About the Author

Tim Wu is an author, a policy advocate and a professor at Columbia University.



A Cycle of Revolution, Fragmentation and Consolidation

Revolutions in communications technology encourage the formation of new companies that outperform old businesses based on outdated technologies. The fragmented frenzy of these revolutions fades as dominant companies buy or bankrupt smaller competitors. The diffuse nature of the Internet is the antithesis of centralized control, public or private, but if history is a useful guide, disjointed control of online content may yield to more concentrated power over the Internet. After all, the commercial forces of consolidation and concentration have prevailed in every communications revolution since the invention of the telephone in the late 1800s.

The Birth of the Bell System

The telephone, like subsequent major advances in communications technology, had several contemporaneous inventors. On the same day in 1876, inventors Alexander Graham Bell and Elisha Gray both registered for US patent protection for telephones they developed separately. Professor Bell had scant interest in running a business, but access to capital ultimately set him apart from other inventors. In 1877, he and a group of investors founded...

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

Move Fast and Break Things
Streaming, Sharing, Stealing
The Laws of Disruption
The Rise and Fall of American Growth
Hit Makers

Related Channels

Comment on this summary

  • Avatar
  • Avatar
    Thomas Dargan 2 years ago
    Wu tires to predict terrible consequences, and he is of course off the mark, prediction being hard, especially about the future, and thus seems to disprove his argument, even when the actual consequences are even worse. He might be better off picking up the snake by the other end, and considering origins rather than results. Who owns my packets? I do, got my name on them.
    Where is the Internet? On public property. 90% of outside plant is on municipal property. The Internet is common carriage on public rights of way.