Instant access to over 22,000 book summaries
Discover your next favorite book with getAbstract.
See prices >>
Stay up-to-date with emerging trends in less time.
Learn more >>
While the rating tells you how good a book is according to our two core criteria, it says nothing about its particular defining features. Therefore, we use a set of 20 qualities to characterize each book by its strengths:
Applicable – You’ll get advice that can be directly applied in the workplace or in everyday situations.
Analytical – You’ll understand the inner workings of the subject matter.
Background – You’ll get contextual knowledge as a frame for informed action or analysis.
Bold – You’ll find arguments that may break with predominant views.
Comprehensive – You’ll find every aspect of the subject matter covered.
Concrete Examples – You’ll get practical advice illustrated with examples of real-world applications or anecdotes.
Controversial – You’ll be confronted with strongly debated opinions.
Eloquent – You’ll enjoy a masterfully written or presented text.
Engaging – You’ll read or watch this all the way through the end.
Eye opening – You’ll be offered highly surprising insights.
For beginners – You’ll find this to be a good primer if you’re a learner with little or no prior experience/knowledge.
For experts – You’ll get the higher-level knowledge/instructions you need as an expert.
Hot Topic – You’ll find yourself in the middle of a highly debated issue.
Innovative – You can expect some truly fresh ideas and insights on brand-new products or trends.
Insider’s take – You’ll have the privilege of learning from someone who knows her or his topic inside-out.
Inspiring – You’ll want to put into practice what you’ve read immediately.
Overview – You’ll get a broad treatment of the subject matter, mentioning all its major aspects.
Scientific – You’ll get facts and figures grounded in scientific research.
Visionary – You’ll get a glimpse of the future and what it might mean for you.
Well structured – You’ll find this to be particularly well organized to support its reception or application.
McKay Coppins, author of The Wilderness and a staff writer at The Atlantic, explores how some Americans resist social distancing and other coronavirus preventative behavior in the name of political beliefs. Compliance and its lack, according to Coppins, seems to follow Democratic or Republican loyalties, respectively. He interviews people from both parties to determine the path of this latest culture war. This lively, informative Atlantic piece provides an intriguing, if troubling, illustration of how almost anything in American life can be bent to political ends.
- Social distancing has, in certain places, become an expression of political beliefs.
- Some extreme reactions seem like “right-wing performance art.“
- Scientists and health experts maintain that Americans must practice social distancing to slow the coronavirus spread.
- Public health remains a political football.
Social distancing has, in certain places, become an expression of political beliefs.
Geoff Frost, a 43-year-old Democrat, noticed the commencement of cultural warfare related to the coronavirus at his Atlanta, Georgia country club golf course. To enforce social distancing, the club closed its restaurant, removed water bottles and limited carts to one per person. Though club members of opposing political views had always been cordial with one another, the new policies fomented division.
Frost and his friends went to the driving range. They used hand sanitizer and kept six feet between them. Older Republican members ostentatiously shook hands and talked at high volume, casting coronavirus as a “stupid hoax.” They crammed into golf carts two by two. Frost wanted to urge the men to be more cautious, but, he realized, “It’s become a political thing.”
“As the coronavirus now emerges as another front in the culture war, social distancing has come to be viewed in some quarters as a political act—a way to signal which side you’re on.”
At first, Americans seem to embrace social distancing. Schools shut down in all states, regardless of their political majority. President Donald Trump made light of the pandemic and then changed his views. Those who echo him in the media followed his erratic course. This led, briefly, to consensus. Both Fox News and MSNBC offered the same hand-washing and social distancing message.
Then Trump demanded that the nation go back to its previous ways. He issued a now-famous tweet, urging that the cure “not be worse than the problem…” Though Trump backed off again within a few days, the usual pattern followed: Democrats assailed him; the press joined in and everyone in “MAGA-world” jumped to Trump’s defense. The coronavirus is now a weapon in the culture war and many people consider social distancing or its absence as a statement of political belief and a way to show where you stand.
Some extreme reactions seem like “right-wing performance art.”
Jerry Falwell, Jr. reopened his evangelical Liberty University, though local officials urged him against it. The Federalist, a conservative web magazine, suggested holding “chicken-pox parties” to spread the virus. Right-wing media figures and politicians called for letting the older and unwell die if that meant the economy could thrive. “I would rather die than kill the country,” radio host Glenn Beck insisted. Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick told Fox News that “70-plus” people like him could handle their own care. Conservative pundit Dennis Prager said that using social-distancing tactics to halt the spread of the virus was like appeasing Nazis. “No one can die?” he said. “Then it’s not a war.”
“The polarization around public health seems to be accelerating.”
A sales representative named Bret from Plano, Texas said he and his conservative community had little fear of the outbreak. He regarded most news as “panic-mongering” by anti-Trump media. He had wanted business to begin again at Easter, 2020. Store manager Terry Trahan in Lubbock, Texas asserted that “toxic tribalism” shapes people’s outlooks. Democrats regard the outbreak as more threatening, he believes, and Republicans downplay it. He thought Democrats who continued to urge further preventative measures were seeking justification for their earlier panic.
Scientists and health experts maintain that Americans must practice social distancing to slow the coronavirus spread.
Experts fear that attaching political views to commonsense practices might add to the public’s danger. Many who don’t practice social distancing have no choice – they have to work. Others remain uninformed. And, of course, tactics in the fight against the pandemic must be weighed against economic concerns.
Public health remains a political football.
Alabama and Mississippi’s Republican governors balked at “mitigation policies.” Polls showed that Republicans nationwide worried less about coronavirus than Democrats did. In 23 of the 25 states with the lowest drop in personal travel, Trump won the last election. One factor in this may be that, as of this writing, the coronavirus had been most virulent in coastal urban centers.
Katherine Vincent-Crowson, a self-defense teacher in Sidell, Louisiana, loves the philosophies of author Ayn Rand. She found Louisiana’s shelter-in-place order to be “militaristic.” Much more galling for her is “self-righteous” posting on social media casting blame on those who don’t stay at home. She described her views as “libertarian,” and expressed great displeasure at anyone trying to control her behavior.
About the Author
Author of The Wilderness, McKay Coppins is an Atlantic staff writer.
This document is restricted to personal use only.