Summary of Values and Vaccines

Looking for the article?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Values and Vaccines summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

8

Qualities

  • Controversial
  • Innovative
  • Eye Opening

Recommendation

Scientists and journalists alike often assume that parents who refuse to vaccinate their children are, at best, uninformed, or, at worst, willfully negligent. But what if there were another side to this story? In this groundbreaking essay, science journalist Maggie Koerth-Baker goes in search of a new, philosophically-based narrative to explain why parents – especially the well-off, and well-educated – reject mandatory vaccination for their children. getAbstract recommends her article to everyone working in public health and to the parents of young children.

About the Author

Maggie Koerth-Baker writes the monthly column Eureka for The New York Times Magazine. Her most recent book is Before the Lights Go Out: Conquering the Energy Crisis Before It Conquers Us.

 

Summary

The rationale behind vaccination laws and the risks – both personal and societal – of not vaccinating a child are manifold. Vaccinations work to prevent disease in the vaccinated individual; but they also work to create “herd immunity”: When the majority of people vaccinate, it cuts down on chances that an infection will spread widely if someone contracts the disease.

Studies show that most people know the reasons vaccination matters, so why would any parent push back against the principle of mandatory...


More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

Denialism
8
The Rise of Junk Science
7
When Evidence Says No, but Doctors Say Yes
8
Can People Be Saved from a Terrible Childhood?
8
Have Smartphones Destroyed a Generation?
8
Revenge of the Lunch Lady
8

Related Channels

Comment on this summary