- Concrete Examples
Expectations for the publication of the Special Counsel report into Russian interference in the 2016 elections were set extremely high. Although the report revealed much damning evidence against President Donald Trump, it has not contributed to the formation of a national consensus and has only reinforced entrenched political identities. The historian Stephen Kotkin has written a refreshingly objective analysis of the report’s findings and the public interpretations of its conclusions, highlighting weaknesses in the arguments of both Trump’s supporters and opponents, as well as shortcomings of the report itself. Anyone who wants to rise above the various subplots of the Trump–Russia saga will appreciate Kotkin’s effort to place the Trump–Mueller feud into broader historical context.
About the Author
Stephen Kotkin is Founding Co-Director of Princeton University’s Program in History and the Practice of Diplomacy and a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution.