Summary of Three Stories About Capitalism

Looking for the video?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Three Stories About Capitalism summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

9 Overall

9 Applicability

8 Innovation

9 Style


Recommendation

Does capitalism prey on the downtrodden or provide a path to economic freedom? This debate has pitted liberals against conservatives for decades. Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt posits that both narratives offer some truths. His eloquent, entertaining argument proffers a definition for capitalism that may bridge the chasm between both sides of the political debate and create common ground for progress. Though Haidt’s solution is a touch idealistic, getAbstract recommends his worthy report to politicians, business executives, and economic and social reformists.

In this summary, you will learn

  • How “tame problems” and “wicked problems” differ,
  • Why political polarization is a wicked problem, and
  • How to bridge the gap between the political left and right in a way that will accommodate both sides of the divide.
 

About the Speaker

Jonathan Haidt is a professor of ethical leadership at New York University’s Stern School of Business.

 

Summary

A “tame problem” – such as a cholera outbreak – is a “definable, understandable and consensual” issue. Specialists can agree on the cause of and solution to the crisis. Conversely, to address a

More on this topic

By the same author

The Coddling of the American Mind
The Coddling of the American Mind
9
The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail
The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail
8
The Happiness Hypothesis
The Happiness Hypothesis
9

Customers who read this summary also read

People Get Ready
People Get Ready
8
Tales from a Crisis
Tales from a Crisis
8
Audacity
Audacity
8
Truth Decay
Truth Decay
8
Why Liberals Win the Culture Wars (Even When They Lose Elections)
Why Liberals Win the Culture Wars (Even When They Lose Elections)
8
Health Divides
Health Divides
9

Related Channels

Comment on this summary